GPA guides & academic planning

Report the original UK award and institution's classification rule instead of assigning First, 2:1, 2:2, and Third universal U.S. GPA ranges.

Compare named grading policies rather than assuming two scale maxima reveal grade bands, pass marks, credits, or U.S. GPA equivalents.

Follow documented grading milestones at Yale, Mount Holyoke, and Harvard without turning local records into a universal origin story.

A 4.0, 5.0, or 12-point label does not reveal how a GPA works. Use this checklist to evaluate the complete, versioned policy behind the number.

Separate percentage grades, local course weights, and recipient recalculation instead of treating percentage divided by 100 times five as a GPA.

Apply McMaster's named course-grade table and unit weighting without treating it as a universal Canadian 12-to-4 conversion.

Convert percentages only after identifying the issuing school's letter-grade bands and the recipient's grade-point and course-inclusion rules.

Build a course-group GPA from a named catalog or application-service definition without assuming core and elective are universal or mutually exclusive categories.

Compare current and proposed program requirements without treating a major change as a predicted GPA drop, graduation delay, cost, or approval.

Learn why STEM GPA, AMCAS BCPM, CASPA Science, and major GPA are not interchangeable—and how to build a recipient-specific course-group worksheet.

Create a manual inclusion ledger for a named program's major GPA, including cross-listed, transfer, repeated, and non-letter-grade courses.

Decide whether to preserve original marks, reproduce an issuer table, follow a recipient formula, or obtain a requested credential evaluation before converting GPA.